Comparación de las Propiedades Mecánicas Carga- Deflexión y Tensión - Esfuerzo de los Alambres de Ortodoncia GUMMETAL® y CuNiTi

This study was carried out by using a sample of sixty transversal -section orthodontic wires, 0.017x 0.025 inches gauge; thirty were GUMMETAL® alloy and thirty were thermoactivated CuNiTi in order to evaluate and compare variables by load-deflection and Stress -Strain. Samples were evaluated and com...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Junco Arenas, Yuli Alexandra, Sotelo Cancelado, Geider Harrinson, Cabrera Ordoñez, Lucy Karolina, Chaverra Castellar, Marian Janeth
Otros Autores:	Jaimes, Gustavo
Formato:	Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización)
Lenguaje:	spa
Publicado:	Universidad Antonio Nariño 2022
Materias:	Comparación Propiedades Mecánicas, Carga, Deflexión, Alambres de Ortodoncia 610 Comparison, Mechanical Propertis, Load, Deflection, Orthodontic Wires
Acceso en línea:	http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/6365
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

Descripción
Sumario:	This study was carried out by using a sample of sixty transversal -section orthodontic wires, 0.017x 0.025 inches gauge; thirty were GUMMETAL® alloy and thirty were thermoactivated CuNiTi in order to evaluate and compare variables by load-deflection and Stress -Strain. Samples were evaluated and compared by tensile tests on the Shimadzu® AG-IS universal mechanical testing machine. It was possible to establish that GUMMETAL® has a much higher elastic limit; with regard to the force, it was possible to determine that GUMMETAL® shows a lower and constant force; with the variable 'stiffness' CuNiTi showed a low but less stable stiffness, while GUMMETAL® on the contrary showed a higher stiffness but at the same time more constant; CuNiTi showed a much higher but more unstable range, and GUMMETAL® showed a much smaller but more stable range.