Revisión Sistemática: Factores Etiológicos y Prevalencia Relacionados con la Hipomineralización en Niños
Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) is defined as an alteration of the enamel, of unknown origin where it has been related to systemic factors, which occurs during enamel formation (amylogenesis). The teeth affected by this pathology present less mineral, which is why they are more sensitive to c...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Antonio Nariño
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/5030 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH) is defined as an alteration of the
enamel, of unknown origin where it has been related to systemic factors, which occurs during
enamel formation (amylogenesis). The teeth affected by this pathology present less mineral,
which is why they are more sensitive to changes in temperature and trauma, including
masticatory shock, causing significant discomfort for the child due to the high sensitivity that it
presents and in some cases it affects the aesthetic and emotional of the individual Objective: To
carry out a systematic review to determine the Factors Related to Molar Incisor
Hypomineralization in children according to scientific evidence. Objective: to determine the
Factors Related to Inciso Molar Hypomineralization in children. Materials and Methods: The
methodology used for the study comprises an integrative study based on a systematic review of
the scientific literature in which the factors that influence MIH were selected and analyzed in
detail. Results: From the analyzed articles, it can be deduced that IMH is of multifactorial origin
and there is no specific cause established as an etiological factor and different systemic factors
are associated. The prevalence varies between 2% and 40.8%, Conclusions: The difference
found in prevalence is due to external conditions such as the economic level of a country, given
that the more power they have, the more strengthened their health model can be. |
|---|
