Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44...
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , |
|---|---|
| Otros Autores: | |
| Formato: | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
Universidad Antonio Nariño
2021
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| Sumario: | Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage
through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems.
Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020
was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74)
resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and
thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional
etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental
technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with
Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage.
Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in
terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated
less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage.
Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful
difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was
founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must
be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional
adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel. |
|---|
