Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia.
The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mor...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Universidad Antonio Nariño
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1812646780523773952 |
|---|---|
| author | Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola |
| author2 | Cruz Uribe, Jaime Fabian |
| author_facet | Cruz Uribe, Jaime Fabian Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola |
| author_sort | Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola |
| collection | DSpace |
| description | The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms. |
| format | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| id | repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-2693 |
| institution | Repositorio Digital UAN |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Universidad Antonio Nariño |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-26932024-10-09T23:32:52Z Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola Cruz Uribe, Jaime Fabian Bienestar animal sistemas de producción porcina sistemas intensivos de producción de cerdos sistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdos bienestar en cerdas gestantes bienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactancia protocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdos sistemas tipo outdoor mortalidad de lechones parasitismo en producciones porcinas estereotipias en cerdos enriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdos Animal welfare pig production systems intensive pig production systems organic pig production systems welfare in pregnant sows welfare in lactating sows protocols for organic systems in pigs outdoor type systems piglet mortality parasitism in pig productions stereotypies in pigs environmental enrichment in pigs The main objective was to evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of the “outdoor” type systems on the welfare of pregnant and lactating sows, in order to be able to make a comparison between the different types of pig production that exist, based on three main parameters, stereotypies, piglet mortality and parasitic diseases, likewise to analyze these types of systems in relation to animal welfare, based on the principles of the 5 freedoms. El objetivo principal fue evaluar las ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas tipo “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia, para así poder hacer una comparación entre los diferentes tipos de producción porcina que existe, basándonos en tres parámetros principales, estereotipias, mortalidad de lechones y enfermedades parasitarias, de igual manera lograr analizar estos tipos de sistemas en relación con el bienestar animal, basándonos en los principios de las 5 libertades. Médico(a) Veterinario(a) Pregrado Presencial 2021-03-05T15:50:59Z 2021-03-05T15:50:59Z 2020-07-10 Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693 Antunovi , B., Vargovi , L., Cvrkovi , D., Kundih, K., Spaji , R., Sili, V. , Ostovi , M. (2012). Poljoprivreda. Biosigurnosne Mjere u intenzivnome svinjogojstvu, 18(1), 60-64. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net/ Baxter, E. M., Andersen, I. L., & Edwards, S. A. (2018). Sow welfare in the farrowing crate and alternatives. Advances in Pig Welfare, 27-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-101012-9.00002-2 Budiño, F. E. L., Vieira, R. F. N., Mello, S. P., & Duarte, K. M. R. (2014). Behavior and performance of sows fed different levels of fiber and reared in individual cages or collective pens. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 86(4), 2109-2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201420140301 Bunge Mennerich, V. B. (2003). Züchtungskunde . Intensive Schweinehaltung – Chance oder Risiko?, 75(6), 452-458. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Caldara, F. R., Rosa, P. S. G., Ferreira, R. A., Reis, N. M. de O., Nääs, I. de A., Paz, I. C., Ferreira, V. M. (2012). Behavior, performance and physiological parameters of pigs reared in deep bedding. Engenharia Agrícola, 32(1), 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-69162012000100005 Campiño, G. P., Espinosa, A., & Ocampo, D. (2010, 1 octubre). Comportamiento de Cerdos de Engorde en un Sistema de Cama Profunda Utilizando Racimos Vacíos de Palma de Aceite Elaeis guineensis Jacq. ORINOQUIA, 14(2), 147-159. Recuperado de ScienceDirect Charlotte, G. E., Henricia, G., Büttnera, K., Meyerb, C., & Krieter, J. (2016, 11 abril). Does housing influence maternal behaviour in sows? Elsevier, 1(180), 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect Choi, Y., Min, Y., Kim, Y., Jeong, Y., Kim, D., Kim, J., & Jung, H. (2020). Effects of loose farrowing facilities on reproductive performance in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 62(2), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.218 Código Terrestre: OIE - World Organisation for Animal Health. (2019). Recuperado 5 de mayo de 2020, de https://www.oie.int/es/normas/codigo-terrestre Criterios de bienestar animal - Certificado Welfair. (2019, 15 octubre). Recuperado 20 de junio de 2020, de https://www.animalwelfair.com/certificado-welfair/criterios/ Edwards, S., & Leeb, C. (2018). Organic pig production systems, welfare and sustainability. Achieving sustainable production of pig meat , 1, 249-270. https://doi.org/10.19103/as.2017.0030.13 Fernandes, H. C., Moreira, R. F., Longui, F. C., Rinaldi, P. C., & Siqueira, W. (2011). Efeito do aquecimento e resfriamento de pisos no desempenho de matrizes e leitões. Rev. Ceres Viçosa, 58(6), 701-709. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-737X2011000600004 Gade, P. B. (2002). Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Science, 62(3), 353-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0309-1740(02)00123-7 Godyń, D., Nowicki, J., & Herbut, P. (2019). Effects of Environmental Enrichment on Pig Welfare—A Review. Animals, 9(6), 383. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9060383 Gourdine, J. L., De Greef, K. H., & Rydhmer, L. (2010, 19 abril). Breeding for welfare in outdoor pig production: A simulation study. Livestock Science, (132) pag, 26-34. Recuperado de ScienceDirect. Grunert, K. G., Sonntag, W. I., Glanz-Chanos, V., & Forum, S. (2018). Consumer interest in environmental impact, safety, health and animal welfare aspects of modern pig production: Results of a cross-national choice experiment. Meat Science, 137, 123-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.11.022 Horback, K. M., Pierdon, M. K., & Parsons, T. D. (2016). Behavioral preference for different enrichment objects in acommercial sow herd. Elsevier , 184, 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2016.09.002 Hötzel, M. J., Machado Filho, L. C., & Dalla Costa, O. A. (2005). Behaviour of pre-parturient sows housed in intensive outdoor or indoor systems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 40(2), 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2005000200010 Huerta, R., & Gasa , J. (2012). Instalaciones para porcinos (Red Porcina Iberoamericana P, 1-13). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Izquierdo, A. C., Ruiz, C. G., Campos, V. X., Mendoza, M. M., Huerta, R., Mancera, A. V., … Guerra , E. (2016). El bienestar animal en la producción porcina. II (BM Editores). Recuperado de https://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Kijlstra, A., & Eijck, I. A. J. M. (2006). Animal health in organic livestock production systems: a review. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1573-5214(06)80005-9 KilBride, A. L., Mendl, M., Statham, P., Held, S., Harris, M., Marchant-Forde, J. N., … Green, L. E. (2014). Risks associated with preweaning mortality in 855 litters on 39 commercial outdoor pig farms in England. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 117(1), 189-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.08.004 Knecht, D., & Jankowska Mąkosa, A. (2020). Endoparasites in Sows and Selected Reproduction Parameters. Acta Veterinaria, 70(1), 71-80. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2020-0005 Kobek Thorsen, C., Aagaard Schild, S. L., Rangstrup, L., Bilde, C., & Pedersen, L. J. (2017). The effect of farrowing duration on maternal behavior of hyperprolific sows in organic outdoor production. Livestock Science, 204, 92-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.015 Lange, A., Gentz, M., Hahne, M., Lambertz, C., Gauly, M., Burfeind, O., & Traulsen, I. (2020). Effects of Different Farrowing and Rearing Systems on Post-Weaning Stress in Piglets. Agriculture, 10(6), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10060230 Lawrence, A. B., & Terlouw, E. M. C. (2013). A review of behavioral factors involved in the development and continued performance of stereotypic behaviors in pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 71(10), 2815-2825. https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71102815x Lindgren, K., Gunnarsson, S., Höglund, J. et al. Nematode parasite eggs in pasture soils and pigs on organic farms in Sweden. Org. Agr. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13165-019-00273-3 Lühken, E., Nicolaisen, T., Risch, B., Volkmann, N., Schnier, S., Schulz, J., & Kemper, N. (2019). Comparison of Two Free-Farrowing Systems and a Conventional Farrowing Crate System with Special Regard to Air Hygiene. Agriculture, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010012 Luković, Z., Škorput, D., & Karolyi, D. (2017). Pig welfare at different production systems. Researchgate, 170-175. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Maganga, G. D., Kombila, L. B., Boundenga, L., Kinga, I. C. M., Obame-Nkoghe, J., Tchoffo, H., … Awah-Ndukum, J. (2019). Diversity and prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in farmed pigs in Southeast Gabon, Central Africa. Veterinary World, 12(12), 1888-1896. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1888-1896 Manteca , X. (2012). Bienestar animal (Red Porcina Iberoamericana. p. 97-111). Recuperado de http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar Mellor, D. (2017). Operational Details of the Five Domains Model and Its Key Applications to the Assessment and Management of Animal Welfare. Animals, 7(12), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7080060 Mesarec, N., Povše, M. P., Škorjanc, D., & Skok, J. (2017). Gangs of piglets: Welfare and growth of imprinted and guided weaners. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 44-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.05.018 Nazareno, A. C., da Silva, I. J. O., Nunes, M. L., de Castro, A. C., Miranda, K. O., & Trabachini, A. (2012). Caracterização bioclimática de sistemas ao ar livre e confinado para a criação de matrizes suínas gestantes. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, 16(3), 314-319. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1415-43662012000300013 Nevrkla, P., & Hadaš, Z. (2015). Effect of Housing of Lactating Sows on Their Reproductive Performance and Losses of Piglets From Birth to Weaning. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(1), 95-100. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563010095 Oliveira da Silva, I. J., Pandorfi, H., & De Stefano Piedade, S. M. (2007, 5 diciembre). Influência do sistema de alojamento no comportamento e bem-estar de matrizes suínas em gestação. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 37(7), 1319-1329. Recuperado de www.sbz.org.br Oliveira, R. F., Soares, R. T. R. N., Molino, J. P., Costa, R. L., Bonaparte, T. P., Silva Júnior, E. T., … Santos, I. P. (2016). Environmental enrichment improves the performance and behavior of piglets in the nursery phase. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, 68(2), 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4162-8253 Park, H. S., Min, B., & Oh, S. H. (2017). Research trends in outdoor pig production — A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 30(9), 1207-1214. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.17.0330 Principles of Organic Agriculture. (2020, 6 marzo). Recuperado 17 de junio de 2020, de https://www.ifoam.bio/principles-organic-agriculture-brochure Ruff, G. R., Pairis-Garcia, M. D., Campler, M. R., Moeller, S. J., & Johnson, A. K. (2017). Effect of rubber mats on sow behavior and litter performance during lactation. Livestock Science, 204, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2017.08.010 Schrey, L., Kemper, N., & Fels, M. (2017). Behaviour and skin injuries of sows kept in a novel group housing system during lactation. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 749-757. https://doi.org/10.1080/09712119.2017.1394308 Scipioni, R., Martelli, G., & Antonella Volpelli, L. (2009). Assessment of welfare in pigs. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8(sup1), 117-137. https://doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.117 Špinka, M., Illmann, G. , Chaloupková, H., Náměstková, P., & Neuhauserová, K. (2009). Pig vocalizations as a measure of hunger lfare Quality, 3-13. Recuperado de https://www.researchgate.net Tatemoto, P., Bernardino, T., Morrone, B., Queiroz, M., & Zanella, A. J. (2020). Stereotypic Behavior in Sows Is Related to Emotionality Changes in the Offspring. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 7, 79. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00079 Tavares de Oliveira , N., Carvalho, P. L., Genova, J. L., Rodrigues Silveira, F. H., Ogawa, L., Cristofori, E. C., … Almeida Santana, A. L. (2019). Effect of endoparasites occurrence in sows from intensive production system. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária, 28(4), 722-727. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612019091 Van de Weerd, H. A., & Day, J. E. L. (2009). A review of environmental enrichment for pigs housed in intensive housing systems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 116(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.08.001 instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/ spa Acceso a solo metadatos Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb application/pdf application/pdf Universidad Antonio Nariño Medicina Veterinaria Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria Bogotá - Circunvalar |
| spellingShingle | Bienestar animal sistemas de producción porcina sistemas intensivos de producción de cerdos sistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdos bienestar en cerdas gestantes bienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactancia protocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdos sistemas tipo outdoor mortalidad de lechones parasitismo en producciones porcinas estereotipias en cerdos enriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdos Animal welfare pig production systems intensive pig production systems organic pig production systems welfare in pregnant sows welfare in lactating sows protocols for organic systems in pigs outdoor type systems piglet mortality parasitism in pig productions stereotypies in pigs environmental enrichment in pigs Angel Gonzalez, Jenny Paola Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. |
| title | Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. |
| title_full | Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. |
| title_fullStr | Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. |
| title_short | Revisión literaria – ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas “outdoor” sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestación y lactancia. |
| title_sort | revision literaria ventajas y desventajas de los sistemas outdoor sobre el bienestar de cerdas en gestacion y lactancia |
| topic | Bienestar animal sistemas de producción porcina sistemas intensivos de producción de cerdos sistemas orgánicos de producción de cerdos bienestar en cerdas gestantes bienestar en cerdas en etapa de lactancia protocolos de sistemas orgánicos en cerdos sistemas tipo outdoor mortalidad de lechones parasitismo en producciones porcinas estereotipias en cerdos enriquecimiento medioambiental en cerdos Animal welfare pig production systems intensive pig production systems organic pig production systems welfare in pregnant sows welfare in lactating sows protocols for organic systems in pigs outdoor type systems piglet mortality parasitism in pig productions stereotypies in pigs environmental enrichment in pigs |
| url | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/2693 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT angelgonzalezjennypaola revisionliterariaventajasydesventajasdelossistemasoutdoorsobreelbienestardecerdasengestacionylactancia |
