Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá
This project aims to compare two photovoltaic panels: one with monocrystalline technology and another with polycrystalline technology, considering the characteristic curves, current - voltage (I-V) and power - voltage (P-V). Initially, simulations of the electrical generation of the panels were carr...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Universidad Antonio Nariño
2022
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/7257 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1812647960782045184 |
|---|---|
| author | Guarin Contreras, Jeferson Stiven Sandoval Caro, Sergio Andrés |
| author2 | Romero Rodríguez, Jorge Enrique |
| author_facet | Romero Rodríguez, Jorge Enrique Guarin Contreras, Jeferson Stiven Sandoval Caro, Sergio Andrés |
| author_sort | Guarin Contreras, Jeferson Stiven |
| collection | DSpace |
| description | This project aims to compare two photovoltaic panels: one with monocrystalline
technology and another with polycrystalline technology, considering the characteristic
curves, current - voltage (I-V) and power - voltage (P-V). Initially, simulations of the
electrical generation of the panels were carried out taking into account the theoretical
model with the internal parameters and the variables radiation, temperature, current,
voltage and power. Following, the necessary electronic instrumentation was carried out
to measure the irradiance and temperature on the panels, as well as the electrical
variables. Finally, a proof of concept was carried out based on an experimental set-up
that allowed comparing the behavior of the two technologies. From the experimental tests,
it was concluded that the monocrystalline technology panel presented a higher efficiency
with respect to the polycrystalline technology panel. |
| format | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| id | repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-7257 |
| institution | Repositorio Digital UAN |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Universidad Antonio Nariño |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-72572024-10-09T23:07:16Z Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá Guarin Contreras, Jeferson Stiven Sandoval Caro, Sergio Andrés Romero Rodríguez, Jorge Enrique Jutinico Alarcón, Andrés Leonardo panel solar, monocristalino, policristalino, variables eléctricas, radiación temperatura, voltaje, corriente y potencia. photovoltaic panels, . monocrystalline, polycrystalline, electrical variables, radiation temperature, voltage, current and power This project aims to compare two photovoltaic panels: one with monocrystalline technology and another with polycrystalline technology, considering the characteristic curves, current - voltage (I-V) and power - voltage (P-V). Initially, simulations of the electrical generation of the panels were carried out taking into account the theoretical model with the internal parameters and the variables radiation, temperature, current, voltage and power. Following, the necessary electronic instrumentation was carried out to measure the irradiance and temperature on the panels, as well as the electrical variables. Finally, a proof of concept was carried out based on an experimental set-up that allowed comparing the behavior of the two technologies. From the experimental tests, it was concluded that the monocrystalline technology panel presented a higher efficiency with respect to the polycrystalline technology panel. Este trabajo de grado tiene como objetivo comparar dos paneles fotovoltaicos: uno con tecnología monocristalina y el otro con tecnología policristalina, considerando las curvas características, corriente – voltaje (I-V) y potencia – voltaje (P-V). Inicialmente, se realizaron simulaciones de la generación eléctrica de los paneles teniendo en cuenta el modelo teórico con los parámetros internos y las variables radiación, temperatura, voltaje corriente y potencia. Seguidamente se realizó la instrumentación electrónica necesaria para medir la irradiancia y la temperatura sobre los paneles, así como las variables eléctricas. Finalmente se realizó una prueba de concepto a partir de un montaje experimental que permitió comparar el comportamiento de las dos tecnologías. A partir de las pruebas experimentales, se concluyó que el panel de tecnología monocristalina presento mayor eficiencia con respecto al panel de tecnología policristalina. Ingeniero(a) Electromecánico(a) Pregrado Presencial Investigación 2022-11-15T20:48:06Z 2022-11-15T20:48:06Z 2022-06-07 Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/7257 [1] J. Gómez-Ramírez, J. D. Murcia-Murcia, and I. Cabeza-Rojas, “LA ENERGÍA SOLAR FOTOVOLTAICA EN COLOMBIA: POTENCIALES, ANTECEDENTES Y PERSPECTIVAS.” [2] M. D. R. H. CELEMÍN, “Fuentes de Energía para el Futuro,” Minist. Educ. POLÍTICA Soc. Y Deport. Secr. ESTADO Educ. Y Form. Dir. Gen. Form. Prof. Inst. Super. Form. y Recur. para el Profr. Ed., vol. NIPO: 660-, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/PdfServlet?pdf=VP12427.pdf&area=E%5Cnhttp s://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/PdfServlet?pdf=VP12427.pdf&area=E. [3] A. Sánchez Juárez et al., “Aplicaciones fotovoltaicas de la energía solar en los sectores residencial, servicio e industrial.” [4] O. NOGUERA, “FACTORES FÍSICOS Y DE DISEÑO QUE INTERVIENEN EN LA EFICIENCIA DE LOS PANELES SOLARES CONSTRUIDOS CON NUEVOS MATERIALES FOTOVOLTAICOS,” Univ. Nusant. PGRI Kediri, vol. 01, pp. 1–7, 2017, Accessed: Apr. 10, 2021. [Online]. Available: http://www.albayan.ae. [5] M. Mani and R. Pillai, “Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: Research status, challenges and recommendations,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 14, no. 9. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 3124–3131, Dec. 01, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.07.065. [6] M. Mirzaei and M. Z. Mohiabadi, “A comparative analysis of long-term field test of monocrystalline and polycrystalline PV power generation in semi-arid climate conditions,” Energy Sustain. Dev., vol. 38, pp. 93–101, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.01.002. 53 [7] L. F. Mulcué-Nieto, L. F. Echeverry-Cardona, A. M. Restrepo-Franco, G. A. GarcíaGutiérrez, F. N. Jiménez-García, and L. Mora-López, “Energy performance assessment of monocrystalline and polycrystalline photovoltaic modules in the tropical mountain climate: The case for Manizales-Colombia,” Energy Reports, vol. 6, pp. 2828–2835, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.09.036. [8] M. Fuentes, G. Nofuentes, J. Aguilera, D. L. Talavera, and M. Castro, “Application and validation of algebraic methods to predict the behaviour of crystalline silicon PV modules in Mediterranean climates,” Sol. Energy, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 1396–1408, Nov. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2006.12.008. [9] L. Ahmad, N. Khordehgah, J. Malinauskaite, and H. Jouhara, “Recent advances and applications of solar photovoltaics and thermal technologies,” Energy, vol. 207, p. 118254, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118254. [10] M. Taraba, J. Adamec, M. Danko, P. Drgona, and T. Urica, “Properties measurement of the thin film solar panels under adverse weather conditions,” in Transportation Research Procedia, Jan. 2019, vol. 40, pp. 535–540, doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.077. instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/ spa Acceso abierto Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Colombia(Bogotá,Dc) Universidad Antonio Nariño Ingeniería Electromecánica Facultad de Ingeniería Mecánica, Electrónica y Biomédica Bogotá - Sur |
| spellingShingle | panel solar, monocristalino, policristalino, variables eléctricas, radiación temperatura, voltaje, corriente y potencia. photovoltaic panels, . monocrystalline, polycrystalline, electrical variables, radiation temperature, voltage, current and power Guarin Contreras, Jeferson Stiven Sandoval Caro, Sergio Andrés Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá |
| title | Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá |
| title_full | Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá |
| title_fullStr | Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá |
| title_short | Comparación de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climáticas de bogotá |
| title_sort | comparacion de celdas fotovoltaicas monocristalina y policristalina en condiciones climaticas de bogota |
| topic | panel solar, monocristalino, policristalino, variables eléctricas, radiación temperatura, voltaje, corriente y potencia. photovoltaic panels, . monocrystalline, polycrystalline, electrical variables, radiation temperature, voltage, current and power |
| url | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/7257 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT guarincontrerasjefersonstiven comparaciondeceldasfotovoltaicasmonocristalinaypolicristalinaencondicionesclimaticasdebogota AT sandovalcarosergioandres comparaciondeceldasfotovoltaicasmonocristalinaypolicristalinaencondicionesclimaticasdebogota |
