Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica
Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
Universidad Antonio Nariño
2021
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1812648645073305600 |
|---|---|
| author | Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra |
| author2 | Jiménez Barba, Gerardo Enrique |
| author_facet | Jiménez Barba, Gerardo Enrique Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra |
| author_sort | Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana |
| collection | DSpace |
| description | Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage
through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems.
Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020
was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74)
resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and
thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional
etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental
technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with
Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage.
Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in
terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated
less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage.
Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful
difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was
founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must
be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional
adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel. |
| format | Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) |
| id | repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-4655 |
| institution | Repositorio Digital UAN |
| language | spa |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher | Universidad Antonio Nariño |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-46552024-10-09T23:28:41Z Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra Jiménez Barba, Gerardo Enrique Ramírez Sulvaran, Jesús Arturo Microfiltación resinas Bulk resinas convencionales clase II Rehabilitación Oral Objetive: This bibliograpic review of literature had as objetive to compare microleakage through light cure resins used in the odontologic restorative practice with two adhesive sistems. Materials and methods: 74 articles related with the object of study published since 2000 to 2020 was colleted; 44 with the most relevance was analyzed and selected, in wich seventy four (74) resins in total was evaluated; of which thirty seven (37) was applied with Bulk Fill technique and thirty seven (37) incremental technique, both aplied techniques with adhesive of conventional etching and self-etching. Results: When comparing data collected resins applied with incremental technique, 43% presented greater microleakage and 57% less microleakage and those applied with Bulk Fill technique, 47% presented less microleakage and 53% showed greater microleakage. Likewise, type of adhesive and the application technique don’t present a meaningful difference in terms of resin composition in forming microleakage. Conclusion: Conventional resins generated less microleakage at the clinical application moment and Bulk Fill generated greater microleakage. Independent application technique of the type of resin to implement didn’t have a meaningful difference. As for the adhesion process of the teeth to restore, none meaningful difference was founded irrespective to the used adhesive. It was determined that the adhesive self-etching must be implement in the presence of dentinal tissue; Finally, it was determined that the conventional adhesive must be implemented in presence of dental enamel. Objetivo: el objetivo de esta revisión bibliográfica de literatura fue la comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado usadas en la práctica odontológica restaurativa con dos sistemas adhesivos. Materiales y métodos: Se recopilaron 74 artículos relacionados con el objeto de estudio publicados desde el año 2000 hasta el año 2020; se analizaron y seleccionaron 44 artículos que tuvieron mayor importancia, donde se evaluaron en total setenta y cuatro (74) resinas; de las cuales treinta y siete (37) fueron aplicadas con técnica Bulk Fill y treinta y siete (37) con técnica incremental, ambas técnicas aplicadas con adhesivos de grabado convencional y autograbador. Resultados: Al comparar los datos obtenidos las resinas aplicadas con técnica incremental, el 43% presentó mayor microfiltración y 57% presentó menor microfiltración y las aplicadas con técnica Bulk Fill, el 47% arrojaron menor microfiltración y 53% tuvieron mayor microfiltración. Así mismo el tipo de adhesivo y la técnica de aplicación no presenta una diferencia significativa en cuanto al compuesto de resina en la formación de las microfiltraciones. Conclusión: Las resinas convencionales generaron menor microfiltración al momento de su aplicación clínica y las resinas de tipo Bulk Fill generaron mayor microfiltración; la técnica de aplicación independiente del tipo de resina a implementar no tuvo diferencia significativa; en cuanto al proceso de adhesión del diente a restaurar, no se encontró diferencia significativa independientemente del adhesivo que se use; se determinó que el adhesivo autograbador debe ser implementado en presencia de tejido dentinario; finalmente se determinó que el adhesivo convencional debe ser implementado en presencia de esmalte. Odontólogo(a) Pregrado Presencial Investigación 2021-08-19T16:00:08Z 2021-08-19T16:00:08Z 2020-11-25 Trabajo de grado (Pregrado y/o Especialización) info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_7a1f http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655 Abdelaziz K., Saleh A. (2018). Influence of adhesive-composite application modalities on their bonding to tooth structure and resistance of the performed restorations to failure. Journal of Dental Sciences, 13, 378-385 Abo Al-Hana, D., El-Messairy, A., ShohaybH, F & Alhadainy H. (2013) Micro-shear bond strength of different composites and glass-ionomers used to reinforce root dentin. Tanta Dental Journal, 10, 58-60. Acurio, P., Falcón, G., Casas, L. (2017). Comparación de la resistencia compresiva de resinas convencionales vs resinas tipo Bulk fill. Odontología Vital 27(0),69-77. Alasbahi, B. (2019). A perspective of marginal microleakage in class II composite resin restorations using different types and techniques: an in-vitro study. J Oral Res, 8(1), 22- 29. Zavattini, A., Mancini, M & Mangani F. (2018). Micro-computed tomography evaluation of microleakage of Class II composite restorations: An in vitro study. European Journal of Dentistry, 12(3), 369-374 Weig, K., Magalhães Filho, T., Costa Neto, C., & Costa, M. (2014). Evaluation of polymerization shrinkage of dental composites by an optical method. Materials Science and Engineering, 47(3), 70-76 Welter, C., Aldrighi, E., Oliveira Da Rosa, W., Fernandes Da Silva, A., & Piva, E. (2018) Polymerization shrinkage stress of resin-based dental materials: a systematic reviw and meta-analyses of composition strategies. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials, 82, 268-281. Watts, D. & Alnazzawi, A. (2014). Temperature-dependent polymerization shrinkagestress kinetics of resin-composites. Material Dental, 30(6), 654-660. Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016b). Correlation between polymerization shrinkagestress and C-factor depends upon cavitycompliance. Dental materials, 32(3), 343–352 Wang, Z. & Chiang, M. (2016a). System compliance dictates the effect of compositefiller content on polymerization shrinkage stress. Dental materials, 32(4), 551-560. instname:Universidad Antonio Nariño reponame:Repositorio Institucional UAN repourl:https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/ spa Acceso abierto Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 application/pdf application/pdf application/pdf Universidad Antonio Nariño Odontología Facultad de Odontología Cúcuta |
| spellingShingle | Microfiltación resinas Bulk resinas convencionales clase II Rehabilitación Oral Morales Llanes, Yesmith Adriana Panqueva Sanchez, Yuliana Alexandra Polania Hernández, Daniela Alexandra Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
| title | Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
| title_full | Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
| title_fullStr | Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
| title_short | Comparación de la microfiltración entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos, revisión bibliográfica |
| title_sort | comparacion de la microfiltracion entre resinas de fotocurado con dos sistemas adhesivos revision bibliografica |
| topic | Microfiltación resinas Bulk resinas convencionales clase II Rehabilitación Oral |
| url | http://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/4655 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT moralesllanesyesmithadriana comparaciondelamicrofiltracionentreresinasdefotocuradocondossistemasadhesivosrevisionbibliografica AT panquevasanchezyulianaalexandra comparaciondelamicrofiltracionentreresinasdefotocuradocondossistemasadhesivosrevisionbibliografica AT polaniahernandezdanielaalexandra comparaciondelamicrofiltracionentreresinasdefotocuradocondossistemasadhesivosrevisionbibliografica |
