La argumentación matemática una herramienta para el desarrollo en procesos de enseñanza-aprendizaje en la escuela
This research monograph aims to evaluate the development of mathematical argumentation processes in three cases of cycle 4 students through mathematical tasks. For this, the work is based on the definition of argumentation by Toulmin (2003), who highlights that this is a complex process given by 6 c...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Tesis/Trabajo de grado - Monografía - Pregrado |
| Language: | Español |
| Published: |
Universidad Antonio Nariño
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/12099 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | This research monograph aims to evaluate the development of mathematical argumentation
processes in three cases of cycle 4 students through mathematical tasks. For this, the work is based
on the definition of argumentation by Toulmin (2003), who highlights that this is a complex
process given by 6 categories: statements, which contain the data prior to the conclusion,
guarantees that allow the statements to be supported, support that correspond to a scientific support
that supports the guarantee, a modal qualifier which is constituted by the word or set of words that
give strength to the reasons (Toulmin, 2003, p. 95), all of this with the objective of giving A
conclusion can later give way to a refutation that is part of the argument. Additionally, Schoenfeld
(1992) allows us to talk about argumentation in mathematical tasks through the solution of
problems proposed by Polya (1990). This theory confirms the use of argumentation as a tool in the
teaching-learning of mathematics. |
|---|
