The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus

Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claimi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel
Format: info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Language:spa
Published: UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑO 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1813306147811098624
author Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel
author_facet Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel
author_sort Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel
collection DSpace
description Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claiming that he was unaware of Newton's method of fluxions when he wrote his papers. The Royal Society appointed a committee that issued a verdict in favor of Newton, without giving Leibniz an opportunity to defend himself. The dispute was continued in pamphlets and correspondence, even after Leibniz's death.
format info:eu-repo/semantics/article
id repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-11160
institution Repositorio Digital UAN
language spa
publishDate 2024
publisher UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑO
record_format dspace
spelling repositorio.uan.edu.co-123456789-111602024-10-14T03:49:53Z The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus La diatriba entre Newton y Leibniz: el cálculo Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel Cálculo integral Cálculo diferencial Historia de la ciencia History of science Differential calculus Integral calculus Professor Miguel Mendez offers a brief historical review of the dispute between Newton and Leibniz over authorship and priority in the creation of the Calculus. The controversy began in 1711 when John Keill, a follower of Newton, accused Leibniz of plagiarism in an article. Leibniz responded, claiming that he was unaware of Newton's method of fluxions when he wrote his papers. The Royal Society appointed a committee that issued a verdict in favor of Newton, without giving Leibniz an opportunity to defend himself. The dispute was continued in pamphlets and correspondence, even after Leibniz's death. El profesor Miguel Mendez ofrece una breve reseña histórica de la disputa entre Newton y Leibniz sobre la autoría y prioridad en la creación del Cálculo. La controversia comenzó en 1711 cuando John Keill, seguidor de Newton, acusó a Leibniz de plagio en un artículo. Leibniz respondió, alegando que desconocía el método de fluxiones de Newton cuando escribió sus artículos. La Royal Society nombró un comité que emitió un veredicto en favor de Newton, sin dar oportunidad a Leibniz de defenderse. La disputa continuó en panfletos y correspondencia, incluso después de la muerte de Leibniz. 2024-01-18 2024-10-10T02:55:28Z 2024-10-10T02:55:28Z info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825 10.54104/saywa.v5n6.1825 https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160 spa https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825/1410 Derechos de autor 2024 Miguel Ángel Méndez Pérez https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 application/pdf UNIVERSIDAD ANTONIO NARIÑO REVISTA SAYWA; Vol. 5 Núm. 6 (2023); 49-52 2744-8576 2711-1571 10.54104/saywa.v5n6
spellingShingle Cálculo integral
Cálculo diferencial
Historia de la ciencia
History of science
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
Méndez Pérez, Miguel Ángel
The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_full The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_fullStr The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_full_unstemmed The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_short The dispute between Newton and Leibniz: Calculus
title_sort dispute between newton and leibniz calculus
topic Cálculo integral
Cálculo diferencial
Historia de la ciencia
History of science
Differential calculus
Integral calculus
url https://revistas.uan.edu.co/index.php/saywa/article/view/1825
https://repositorio.uan.edu.co/handle/123456789/11160
work_keys_str_mv AT mendezperezmiguelangel thedisputebetweennewtonandleibnizcalculus
AT mendezperezmiguelangel ladiatribaentrenewtonyleibnizelcalculo
AT mendezperezmiguelangel disputebetweennewtonandleibnizcalculus
  • Editorial
  • CRAI
  • Repositorio
  • Libros